Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SJK 171

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn, will work to improve article. (non-admin closure) BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 13:48, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SJK 171 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can only find only one reference to the subject in RS, and it's in passing. Also, article appears to be almost entirely WP:AB. If decision is not to delete, will need to be very heavily reworked. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 11:52, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:19, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:19, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:19, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, on the basis of the list of books featuring his work. This is a graffiti artist who was active decades ago, so online sources will not be readily accessible. However, I certainly agree the article needs to be cleaned up. Sionk (talk) 12:58, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment by submitter Is it possible to move the article to draft, rather than deleting it? I'm happy to work to improve it and try to remove the WP:AB issues, and it it could be submitted for review. I don't know if that path is feasible/allowed without having the page deleted first, WP:DRAFTIFY isn't clear, apologies for my ignorance on this. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 13:28, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Does not need to go to draft, but possibly needs TNT. I have added his real name (Steve Kesoglides), which produces lots of results. I have also remove uncited material and removed two of the three portrait photos, which tended to say "this is my autobiography".ThatMontrealIP (talk) 13:44, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.